Introduction
In a democracy, laws are not static. They evolve with society, economy, and culture. While the Parliament makes laws, it is the judiciary that interprets and breathes life into them. Over the last seven decades, the Supreme Court of India has delivered judgments that not only shaped legal principles but also transformed the social, political, and economic fabric of the country.
These judgments are not just legal documents; they are milestones in India’s democratic journey.
Why Are Landmark Judgments Important?
- They interpret the Constitution in new contexts.
- They protect fundamental rights.
- They balance the powers of the State and the citizen.
- They often fill legislative gaps by issuing guidelines (till Parliament acts).
- They reflect the spirit of the times—society’s values, aspirations, and struggles.
Landmark Judgments in Indian History
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
- Known as the Basic Structure Case.
- The Court ruled that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot destroy its basic structure.
- Basic structure includes democracy, rule of law, secularism, and judicial independence.
- Impact: Protected India from becoming a dictatorship by limiting unlimited parliamentary power.
2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
- Expanded the meaning of Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21).
- The Court held that the procedure established by law must be “fair, just, and reasonable.”
- Impact: Brought in the concept of due process, giving wider protection to citizens against arbitrary state action.
3. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
- Concerned the election of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
- The Allahabad High Court had invalidated her election; she appealed.
- The Supreme Court struck down 39th Constitutional Amendment which tried to make the PM’s election immune from judicial review.
- Impact: Reinforced the principle that no one is above the law, not even the Prime Minister.
4. Shah Bano Case (Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, 1985)
- A landmark in women’s rights and Muslim personal law.
- The Court granted maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman under Section 125 of CrPC.
- Triggered nationwide debate and led to the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.
- Impact: Highlighted conflict between secular law vs. personal law.
5. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
- Concerned workplace sexual harassment.
- In absence of legislation, the Court laid down Vishaka Guidelines.
- These later became the basis for the POSH Act, 2013.
- Impact: Strengthened women’s safety and dignity at work.
6. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
- Struck down Section 377 IPC to decriminalize homosexuality.
- Recognized LGBTQ+ rights as part of right to equality and dignity.
- Impact: Socially transformative, made India more inclusive.
7. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
- Concerned misuse of President’s Rule under Article 356.
- The Court held that the power of the President is not absolute and can be reviewed judicially.
- Impact: Strengthened federalism and state autonomy.
8. Right to Privacy Case (K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017)
- The Court declared Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
- Impact: Huge implications for Aadhaar, data protection, and digital rights.
9. Sabarimala Case (Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, 2018)
- Struck down the ban on entry of women of menstruating age into Sabarimala temple.
- Upheld gender equality and freedom of religion.
- Impact: Sparked national debate on faith vs. equality.
10. Ayodhya Case (2019)
- The Supreme Court gave land for Ram temple construction while granting alternate land for a mosque.
- Impact: Brought closure to a decades-long dispute while trying to balance faith and secularism.
The Larger Impact of Landmark Judgments
- Expansion of Rights: From right to education, clean environment, to privacy, the Court has widened fundamental rights.
- Strengthening Democracy: By limiting executive and legislative powers.
- Social Change: From women’s rights to LGBTQ+ rights, judgments have modernized Indian society.
- Judicial Activism: The Court often stepped in when other organs of the State failed.
Criticism of Judicial Interventions
While these judgments are celebrated, critics argue that sometimes courts indulge in judicial overreach—acting like lawmakers rather than interpreters. For example, in matters of governance, environment bans, or quotas, the judiciary is often accused of crossing into legislative or executive territory.
Yet, without such bold interventions, Indian democracy may not have been as resilient.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s landmark judgments are more than legal rulings—they are chapters in the story of India’s democracy. They remind us that the Constitution is a living document, constantly interpreted to meet new challenges.
These judgments ensure that power remains accountable, rights are protected, and justice prevails. They are proof that the judiciary is not just a passive observer but an active participant in shaping India’s destiny.
In the end, it is these judgments that give flesh and blood to the Constitution, making it a document not of lawyers alone but of every citizen.
Leave feedback about this